
Direct from the desk of Dane Williams.
Losing all of your followers and ability to pitch your offer to them would no doubt be catastrophic.
Today we saw yet another high profile business in the crypto space banned from YouTube.
Bitcoin Magazine was in the middle of a live stream when YouTube pressed the button and unceremoniously banned them.
Youtube’s reason?
“...content that encourages illegal activities or encourages users to violate YouTube’s guidelines is not allowed on YouTube,...”
Haha yep, sure.
We’re sure it’s nothing to do with YouTube being the biggest centralised, Web2 video platform with an obvious economic incentive to keep things this way.
Don’t you think that as the biggest, centralised Web2 social platform, YouTube has an obvious economic incentive to keep things as they are?
Anyway, that argument has been made 1000 times and now the decentralisation cat is out of the bag, it’s only a matter of time.
Why do crypto content creators refuse to use Web3 platforms?
But come on, I'm going to deviate and be straight here.
It’s actually embarrassing how genuinely outraged Bitcoin Magazine was that YouTube would have THE AUDACITY to completely remove their ability to make money from their followers.
